|
Post by EasyPeasy on Feb 7, 2023 10:50:38 GMT -5
My Admiral didn't like to overnight on my 21' cuddy cabin. It had a porta potti and full canvas and to me it was more than enough to do a weekend. Heck, I took it across and around Lake Michigan for a two week vacation. But when she said she wanted a dedicated bathroom and two beds, what was I to do but put ol' trusty up for sale and buy another boat. We ended up trading in a deal on a 28' Carver express Cruiser that lasted us 17 years, many many fine hours of family fun as well as Lake MI salmon fishing. We only sold it because we knew we were heading down to FL and would be doing some very different boating down here, but sometimes I still miss that boat. Sometimes the Admirals have great ideas. We had a nice little 24 SeaRay Sundancer with a cuddy cabin. The boss loved it but it 25 years old (20 with me) and the engine was failing. Plus I wanted to start going out of the bay and doing some real fishing offshore. We loved the bigger center console and viewed it on a sunny June afternoon. "Who needs a cabin?" we said. Well, turns out we really *do* need a cabin, even in the summer evenings (the admiral needs protection and facilities, and we need to sleep out from time to time). So while I love this boat, I will be in the market until a nice 26 - 28 Ft. express or walkaround comes my way.
|
|
|
Post by DMBekus on Feb 7, 2023 11:34:23 GMT -5
From my extensive research, I have come to the conclusion that the correct formula to determine the number of fishing rods needed is X+1, where 'X' equals the number of rods already owned. Or at least it feels that way. I have started a nice collection, but I can't stop looking online. Algebra is not the proper method to determine the number of rods required. Though I failed Calculus II in college, I do recall calculus is the representation of constant change, the only way to have constant change is to continuously add rods, so more time = more rods- though of course the rate can change, the rate would be determined by; money, desire, negative energy ( in this case often represented by So), but overtime you get more rods. The amount of existing rods you have, has no bearing on the ultimate number of rods you end up with, that can only be determined by the amount of time you have. Infinite time would= infinite number of rods. (So= significant other)
|
|
|
Post by nickbhw on Feb 7, 2023 12:32:12 GMT -5
From my extensive research, I have come to the conclusion that the correct formula to determine the number of fishing rods needed is X+1, where 'X' equals the number of rods already owned. Or at least it feels that way. I have started a nice collection, but I can't stop looking online. Infinite time would= infinite number of rods. Well, I can't argue with math. I'm off to do some online shopping....
|
|